top of page

Note To mother

In the words of the fearless Clint Eastwood from his iconic film “Gran Torino,” the Father, along with his many sisters, dedicate both this website and Clint's thoughtful quote to you:

“Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while that you shouldn’t have fucked with? Well, that’s me.”

Respectfully 😎,

The Father and His Many Sisters



INTRODUCTION
After the mother confessed to having "recurring dreams of being a pedophile in a past life" (7:31pm on February 26, 2014) a confession which the Father recorded and shared with his lawyer - she responded by falsely reporting to the police that the Father had sexually abused their son

 

On February 26, 2016, exactly two years later, the mother submitted a signed and dated letter to the court-appointed Clinical Psychologist and admitted that she had made the "pedophile in a past life" statement in the recording. Her confession was also signed and dated by the Clinical Psychologist. 
 

In her numerous court submissions, the mother falsely claimed that the father had ADHD and then argued that his supposed ADHD condition made him unfit for parenting.

The irony here is two-fold:

  1. The mother submitted a letter to the court stating that her "mental health has not been an issue since 2008"

    • One wonders what her mental health issues were before 2008?​

  2. Furthermore, until at least 2014, the mother's own prescriptions reveal that she has been taking the following medications:

    • Ativan

    • Lorazepam

    • Hydroxyzine

    • Amitriptyline

    • Venlafaxine

    • Trazodone

The mother takes these drugs to help manage her uncontrollable, unhinged behaviours — the specifics of the mother's clinical diagnoses will not be disclosed here. Despite the mother's mental health diagnoses, not once during 11 years of litigation did the father attempt to use her clinical diagnoses as a reason that she should not have parental rights

In 2021, after complaints of abuse from their son, the Children's Aid Society discovered that it was in fact the mother who had been physically abusing their son the entire time.

This ongoing 11-year Custody and Access Battle is the result of a Morally Bankrupt mother and her original piece-of-shit lawyer, Ms. L.

UPDATE:

The mother falsely accused her last live-in boyfriend of assault.  

  • Despite his son's eyewitness testimony, which refutes the mother's false claim, in addition to documentary evidence supporting her ex-boyfriend's innocence, this innocent man is presently on trial because of her never-ending lies.

The mother is a psychopath.


 

THE SHORT VERSION

(TLDR)

Year 1

  • The Father audio-recorded a conversation in which the mother admitted to having "recurring dreams of being a pedophile in a past life." A few days later, the Father informed the mother that he had sought legal counsel. On that same day, two police cars arrived at the Father's residence following a false allegation by the mother that the Father had sexually molested their son.

  • Over a 4-year period, the mother made a total of seven false child sexual abuse accusations against the Father and his family members that resulted in 5 Police and Children's Aid Society investigations. These false accusations only came to a halt after a judge chastised both the mother and her lawyer, Ms. L.

    • ​Her false allegations resulted in the following:

      • 5 Police and Children's Aid Society investigations.​​

        • 4 Police and Children's Aid Society investigations against the Father.

          • ​The mother's own video recordings of her interrogating his son about the alleged incident helped exonerate the Father. (Mother's Interrogation video of his son -- dated 8:14pm on November 9, 2015) ​

        • 1 Police and Children's Aid Society investigation was initiated against the father's sister after she changed the son's diaper on Christmas Day.

          • The father and his family were exonerated by video recordings made by the mother herself, in which she interrogated his son about the alleged incident.
            (Mother's Interrogation video of his son -- dated 10:22am at January 4, 2017)

        • Despite volumes of documentary evidence contradicting the mother's false allegations, the father received years of supervised visitation because of the mother's endless false allegations.

​​

Year 3

  • On January 15, 2016 -- without the Father's knowledge -- the mother completed and signed a falsified School Transfer Form and led school officials to believe that she had sole decision-making powers regarding their son - this was not true - the mother and Father both had shared decision-making powers regarding their son.  8 months later (just days before the start of school), the mother’s crooked lawyer, Ms. L., informed the Father’s lawyer that his son had been moved to a school outside his area to a school in the mother’s area.  

Year 4

  • In November 2017, four years after the mother's first false allegation, the Father was finally granted 50/50 custody and access to his son.

​​

Year 5

  • The mother persisted in her tactics of parental alienation. This included denying the Father access to his son on Father's Day for the fourth time, directly violating a court order that specifically mandated that the Father and son should spend Father's Day together.

Year 6

  • The mother initiated another round of legal proceedings, arguing that she should be granted full custody of their son and exclusive access to him for the entire duration of the COVID-19 pandemic.
    (March 2020)

Year 8

  • IN 2021, THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY VERIFIED THAT THE MOTHER HAD BEEN ABUSING THEIR SON FOR YEARS

  • Once again, the mother launched legal proceedings, insisting that she should have complete custody and access to their son. By this time, their son was old enough to express his own views. Consequently, the mother and Father agreed to conduct a Voice of the Child assessment.

    • During this assessment, their son disclosed to the assessors that the mother had physically abused him for years.

    • The Voice of the Child Assessor promptly notified the Children's Aid Society.  After investigating the mother, the Children’s Aid Society “verified” that the mother had been abusing their son all along.

    • UNSURPISINGLY, the mother faced no repercussions for her verified child abuse  🤬 
      (July 5, 2021)

​​

Year 11

  • Yet again, the mother has initiated legal proceedings.

    • The Children's Aid Society has verified her long-term abuse of his son
      (July 5, 2021)

    • She continues to expose him to sexually explicit material -- which include images of herself and her boyfriend
      (Too many dates to list)

    • The mother's pathological desire for 100% custody and that his son remain with her 100% of the time is a waste of time and money.

  • Litigation is scheduled to begin later in 2024 -- after the May 17, 2024 of the criminal trial of her wrongly-accused ex-boyfriend. 🙄

    • Update: The May 17 trial has been postponed​

THE LONG VERSION

The Father’s Custody And Access Descent Into Hell began in 2013

 

As many know, protracted custody battles can inflict significant psychological and financial strain.  In the Father’s case, it resulted almost bankrupting him personally, succeeded in destroying his business, and almost landed him in prison.  Unable to keep up with his bills due to the ongoing custody dispute, his residence had three separate liens against it.  In 2018, a few months after the custody and access case concluded, his home was on the brink of being auctioned off, only two weeks away.  The Father gathered the necessary funds to pay off the debts accrued during the custody struggle.  The federal tax department imposed “legal demands” on his business and personal accounts; consequently, the Father is still unable to access his accounts as of the spring of 2024.

TOTAL COSTS TO DATE - $401,500

 

The mother continually and intentionally presented falsified information about the Father to various entities, including the Police, the Children’s Aid Society, Social Services, the Children’s Hospital, court judges, and the Clinical Psychologist conducting the Custody and Access Assessment.  All the cases and reports concluded in the Father’s favour.  Moreover, the mother initiated a smear campaign targeting family, friends, and professionals associated with this case, including a police officer, their son’s Doctor, their son’s Babysitter, a substitute Teacher, Professional Supervisors, and the court-appointed Clinical Psychologist.  The mother’s ultimate goal was to prevent the Father from obtaining any form of custody or shared parenting of their son.

 

Her numerous false accusations against the Father resulted in multiple police investigations.

 

Primary sources were exclusively used to document the journal entries on this site.  These include:

 

  1. 480 pages of Children’s Aid Society Reports

  2. Court Orders

  3. Court Briefs submitted by the mother and her attorney

  4. Police Reports

  5. Medical Reports

  6. Letters from the mother’s attorney

  7. The Clinical Psychologist’s Custody and Access Assessment Report

  8. The mother’s dated and signed submissions to the court-appointed Clinical Psychologist

  9. Legally obtained audio recordings

  10. Legally obtained video recordings

  11. The mother’s dated and signed submissions to the Court, where she fabricated lies against the following professionals, jeopardizing their careers:  

    • ​​The Son’s Doctor: The mother falsely claimed that the Doctor stated that “COVID-19 was a hoax,” among other fabrications.  This unfounded and highly dubious claim was dismissed by the Arbitrator (in writing) in the final Arbitration report.
      (March 28, 2020)

    • A Police Detective: The mother wrongfully alleged that the Officer was hired by the Father to surveil her.  The Court dismissed this unsupported claim.
      (December 2, 2015)

    • The Court-appointed Custody and Access Clinical Psychologist, whom the mother lodged a formal complaint to the Clinical Psychologist’s regulatory body. The focus of her complaint was her rabid belief that the father suffers from ADHD and that ADHD should have been the deciding factor in denying him 50/50 custody and access 🙄.   The regulatory body carried out an investigation. The regulatory body wrote a report that cleared the Psychologist of the mother's false allegations.
      (April 29, 2020)

      • Following the mother's logic, and given her various clinical psychological diagnoses, she, herself, should be denied custody of and access to my son.

      • The mother really does have 2 brain cells fighting for 3rd place.​

    • A Substitute Teacher, whom the mother falsely accused of sexually abusing their son.  The Substitute Teacher has not returned to work in the 7 years since the false allegation.
      (December 10, 2016)

    • The Professional Supervisors who oversaw the Father’s visitation.  The mother falsely accused them of allowing the Father to sexually abuse their son under their supervision. In a blistering counterattack, the supervisor organization unleashed a vigorous six-page defense to aggressively refute the mother's baseless allegations.  The supervisor organization attached 900 pages of supervisor notes (about the Father’s visits with their son) for the mother and her attorney to review (May 10, 2016)

    • The Son's Babysitter, whom the mother falsely accused of overdosing their son while the mother slept.
      (October 11, 2012)

    • Her Own Lawyer, Ms L., who received that thrashing of her life from the Judge who ​​questioned Ms. L's inability to keep her lawyer from making false allegations against the father.
      (November 22, 2017)

    • The Father, a consultant, worked at the same company as the mother. He was immediately terminated after the mother made false allegations of abuse. Subsequently, he lost his other consulting contracts and his own consulting firm was ultimately driven to bankruptcy.

Here’s What That Horrible Excuse For A mother Did

2014 - Part 1

How Did This Mess Begin?

One day, around 5:00 PM, the Father was recording an audio clip of his son to send to his parents and siblings residing 500 kilometres away.  While the recording was still in progress, the mother wanted to discuss something with the Father.

It’s important to note that the audio recording device was still operating during their conversation.

The audio recording device captured the entire mother and Father conversation. 

Here’s how the mother initiated the recorded conversation:

 

  • mother: “In a past life I was a pedophile”

  • Father: “In a past life?”

  • mother: “Yeah… a pedophile…exactly, yes.” (the mother continues to talk about this and how she was able to gain access to children)
    (7:31pm on February 26, 2014)

 

How Did The Father React?

To say that this conversation freaked out the Father would be an understatement. 

 

Consider this: What if a Father declared he had dreams of being a “pedophile in a past life,” and his wife reported him to the authorities?  It’s easy to envision how the Children’s Aid Society, the Police, and the Courts would have reacted.

In the Father’s case, however, neither the Children’s Aid Society nor the Police took any action, despite the mother’s recorded recurring dreams of being a “pedophile in a past life” statements. 

What Happened Next?

The mother continued making equally disturbing and bizarre statements after her recorded “pedophile in a past life” confession.  One morning before leaving for work, the Father informed the mother that he had called a lawyer to discuss, among other things, her “pedophile in a past life” confession.  Later that day, the mother emailed the Father stating that she had gone into hiding with their son and made the bizarre claim that she feared for their safety.  Two Police cars showed up at the Father's house to investigate the mother’s allegations that the Father had sexually abused his son and physically abused the mother. 🙄 Ten days following the disappearance of the mother with their son, the maternal grandmother levelled baseless accusations against the Father, claiming he had resorted to intimidation strategies in his efforts to find his son.

In reality, the mother feared an inevitable Children’s Aid Society investigation that would have resulted from her “pedophile in a past life” confession.  To reduce the likelihood of being investigated herself, the mother called the Police and the Children’s Aid Society and falsely alleged that the Father had physically assaulted her and sexually abused their son.  Two days later, during a recorded telephone conversation, the mother confessed that the alleged sexual abuse and physical assault never happened.  But, her confession didn’t stop the 3 month Police and Children’s Aid Society investigation against the Father that resulted from the mother’s allegations.  During the Father’s Children’s Aid Society interview, he played the telephone recording for them, and the case, along with the Police case, was closed in the Father’s favour.

How Did The mother Explain Her Recorded ‘Pedophile’ Statements to the Court-Appointed Clinical Psychologist?

Let’s fast forward, for a moment, 2 years into the almost 4-year custody and access battle.  At this point, the Court-appointed Clinical Psychologist has heard the recording.  The Clinical Psychologist has given the mother a copy of the recording so that she can respond recording’s contents.  This is the first time that the mother heard the recording of her “pedophile in a past life” confession.  The mother never denied making the alarming statements in the recording.  In fact, the mother submitted the following written, dated (February 26, 2016), and signed response to the Clinical Psychologist (the Clinical Psychologist also signed and dated the mother’s response):

  • mother: “This is a recurring dream that I have had since early childhood, and it has no bearing on tendencies toward pedophilia.”

Let the mother’s signed and dated (February 26, 2016) response sink in -- and imagine what would have happened if the Father had written and signed a response like that!  Children’s Aid and the Police would have removed all access to the son from the Father and conducted a very aggressive investigation. 

 

But neither the Children’s Aid Society representative nor Police authority did anything about her repeated "pedophile" statements.

The Father’s 10-Year Journey From Hell 

 

2014 Part - 2

During the three-month investigation, the mother refused to allow the Father unsupervised visitation with their son, repeatedly referencing the ongoing Children’s Aid Society investigation to justify her decision.  Consequently, the Father could only see his son for one hour, one to three times a week, and always in the mother’s presence.

2014 Part 3

In pursuing joint custody and equal shared parenting rights for his son, the Father suggested mediation, to which the mother agreed.  However, after two months of participating in the process, the mother abruptly ceased her involvement.  She stopped responding to all communication from the Father and the mediator regarding continuing mediation sessions.

2014 - Part 4

The Father submitted an application to the Court and stated that he wanted joint custody and equal shared parenting for their son.

 

2014 - Part 5

The Judge issued a temporary court order.  Because their son had been living with his mother for the previous 200 days (status quo), the Judge’s temporary court order stated that their son would continue to live with the mother until there was evidence that a different parenting arrangement would better serve the child’s needs.  The mother insisted on permitting only supervised visitations for the Father with their son.  In response, the Judge set forth a plan in the Temporary Court Order, gradually increasing the Father’s supervised parenting time.  In her court submission, the mother falsely alleged that the Father had ADHD and that his alleged ADHD condition disqualified him from being a suitable parent.  Both parents agreed to a Custody and Access assessment by a Clinical Psychologist.

 

2014 - Part 6

The mother lodged her second false accusation with the Children’s Aid Society, asserting that the Father had sexually abused their son during supervised visitation at a professional facility for supervised visitations.  The Children’s Aid Society interviewed both the Father and the supervisor, and both refuted the abuse allegations.  The Children’s Aid Society concluded the case in the Father’s favour.  Nevertheless, the mother and her lawyer, Ms. L, consistently cited the ongoing Children’s Aid Society investigation as justification for not extending the duration of the father’s supervised time with his son or agreeing to unsupervised access.  The mother’s and lawyer’s actions violated the court order.

2014 Part 7

The mother launched her third false accusation with the Children’s Aid Society, alleging that the Father had sexually abused their son during a supervised visit at a professional facility for supervised visitations.  The Children’s Aid Society interviewed both the Father and the supervisor, and they both denied the claims of abuse.  The Children’s Aid Society concluded the investigation in favour of the Father.  Nevertheless, the mother and her lawyer, Ms. L, consistently cited the ongoing Children’s Aid Society investigation as justification for not extending the duration of the father’s supervised time with his son or agreeing to unsupervised access.  The mother’s and lawyer’s actions violated the court order.

2015 Part 1

The mother made her fourth false allegation to the Children’s Aid Society.  She alleged that the Father sexually abused their son while in the presence of a Supervisor at a professional facility for supervised visitations.  The Children’s Aid Society interviewed the Father and Supervisor, and both stated that the alleged abuse never happened.  The Children’s Aid Society closed the case in the Father’s favour.  Nevertheless, the mother and her lawyer, Ms. L, consistently cited the ongoing Children’s Aid Society investigation as justification for not extending the duration of the father’s supervised time with his son or agreeing to unsupervised access.  The mother’s and lawyer’s actions violated the court order.

 

2015 Part 2

The mother made her fifth false allegation to the Children’s Aid Society and alleged that the Father physically abused their son in the presence of a Supervisor.  The Children’s Aid Society interviewed the Father and Supervisor, and both stated that the alleged abuse never happened.  The Children’s Aid Society closed the case in the Father’s favour.  Nevertheless, the mother and her lawyer, Ms. L, consistently cited the ongoing Children’s Aid Society investigation as justification for not extending the duration of the father’s supervised time with his son or agreeing to unsupervised access.  The mother’s and lawyer’s actions violated the court order.

2015 Part 3

The Father visited the mother’s residence to drop off balloons and a card for his son’s birthday, bringing two witnesses who video-recorded the Father dropping off the birthday items.  Soon after, the Father found himself under a police investigation.  The mother had falsely claimed to the Police that the Father had broken into her home, broke into her safe, and installed surveillance devices throughout the house.  The videos showing the Father arriving by taxi, leaving the gifts, and departing in the same taxi were provided to the authorities, leading to the closure of the case.

 

That year, the Father also became the subject of two additional police investigations because of additional false allegations from the mother.  Both cases were resolved in favour of the Father.

 

2016 - Part 1

The mother made her sixth false allegation to the Children’s Aid Society and alleged that the Father sexually abused their son while in the presence of a Supervisor.  The Children’s Aid Society interviewed the Father and Supervisor, and both stated that the alleged abuse never happened.  The Children’s Aid Society closed the case in the Father’s favour.  Nevertheless, the mother and her lawyer, Ms. L, consistently cited the ongoing Children’s Aid Society investigation as justification for not extending the duration of the father’s supervised time with his son or agreeing to unsupervised access..  The mother’s and lawyer’s actions violated the court order.

2016 - Part 2

A few days prior to their son's first day of elementary school, the mother's lawyer (Ms. L) notified the Father that their son had been transferred from his current school to a new one, a decision made without the Father's consent.  The new school was conveniently within walking distance of the mother's home.  The Father quickly filed an emergency motion with the court to revert their son's enrollment to the school the parents had initially agreed upon.  However, the Judge declared that the situation did not qualify as an emergency and informed the Father that he would have to apply for a regular court hearing in December - four months after their son was illegally moved to the new school.  The Father was subsequently informed that by December, it would likely be in their son's best interest to stay in the new school.

2016 Part 3

The results of the Clinical Psychologist’s Custody and Access Assessment are as follows:

“Joint Custody and Equal shared parenting.”

“The current assessment does not support the continued requirement for the Father’s access to be supervised in that he poses no established or persuasive risk to the child.  Furthermore, the child goes willingly to him and comfortably remains with him and the two have a positive and close relationship.”

“There is a strong bond between the Father and the child, there are no child protection concerns.  The Father is a dedicated, responsible, and available parent.  There is reason in this assessment to support increased parenting time to him so that the child can benefit from having a Father-child relationship.”

How did the mother respond to the report recommending the Father 50/50 custody and access?

  • The mother rejected the report’s recommendations.

  • Without the court’s nor the Father’s permission, the mother hired another Clinical Psychologist to critique and contest the work of the original court-appointed Psychologist.  The second, unauthorized Psychologist supported the 50/50 custody and access recommendations of the original court-appointed Psychologist.

  • The mother, then, lodged a complaint with the court-appointed Clinical Psychologist’s regulatory body and put his career at risk.  The regulatory body investigated the court-appointed Clinical Psychologist.  The April 19, 2020 report, authored by the Clinical Psychologist's regulatory body, was written and the Psychologist was cleared of the mother's false allegations.  

How did the mother’s lawyer (Ms. L) respond to the custody and access report?

The mother’s lawyer (Ms. L) rejected the custody and access report and responded with the following:

“To be clear, the Clinical Psychologist’s recommendations are not binding and have not been tested in Court.  We are not acquiescing to the Clinical Psychologist’s recommendations at this time.”

 

2016: Christmas Day / 2017: New Year’s Eve Day

The Father no longer had to spend time with his son in a supervised 20 x 40 square-foot room.  However, the amount of time he was allowed to spend with his son had not changed.  For the first time in nearly three years, the Father could enjoy two days with his family and son at his own residence.  These two special days were Christmas Day and New Year’s Eve.  However, just two days after New Year’s Eve, the Father received a phone call from the Police.  This time, the mother’s seventh false allegation claimed that the Father and his family members had sexually abused their son.

Note

At this point, several of the father's sisters decided to create the websites fnckyou.com and CUSTODY.WTF as a defence against the overly litigious mother, who continued to make endless false accusations of child sexual abuse against them.

Eight months before this seventh false allegation, shortly after the Clinical Psychologist had submitted his report recommending 50/50 custody and access, the Father had already reached the following conclusion:

 

Given the mother’s proven capability to levy severe and false allegations against him even while he visited his son in a supervised setting within a 20 x 40 square-foot room, it was highly probable that, from a threat and risk assessment perspective, the mother would make similar false allegations once the Father was with his son at his residence.

 

With this in mind, the Father’s family took precautions and video-recorded every second of Christmas Day and New Year’s Eve with his son.

 

Toward the end of the very intense, and sometimes aggressive, two-hour Police interview, the Father presented the Police with the video recordings from Christmas Day and New Year’s Eve.  Once they reviewed the video evidence, the interview concluded, and the Father was free to go.  The Police Detective’s parting advice to the Father was “to continue doing whatever he legally needed to do to protect himself from the mother.” The case was subsequently closed in the Father’s favour.

2017 Part 2

Settlement Conference #1 in front of a Judge at the Court House

 

The Father and the mother attended a Settlement Conference before a Judge at the Court House.  The Judge stated that she “was disturbed” by the mother’s behaviour and that “the mother’s actions amounted to child abuse.” 

The Judge also chastised the mother’s lawyer (Ms. L) for allowing the mother to make so many false allegations.  The exchange between the Judge and the mother’s lawyer went as follows:

  • Judge: “Why did you let her make so many false accusations?  Why didn’t you stop her?”

  • mother’s lawyer (Ms. L) : “I tried to stop her.”

  • Judge: “You didn’t try hard enough.”
    (November 22, 2017)

The Judge stated that the Clinical Psychologist’s reports were “glowing” for the Father and “not so great” for the mother’s interactions with their son.  The Judge strongly encouraged the mother to implement the joint custody and equal shared parenting recommendations outlined in the Clinical Psychologist’s report.  However, the mother refused to implement the recommendations.  The mother would only agree to implement an access schedule that, over time, would raise the Father’s unsupervised parenting time with their son to 30% -- she refused any more time than that.  As a result, both access and custody issues would be decided at trial in December later that year.

2017 Part 3

A Second Settlement Conference before a Judge at the Court House and trial had all been pre-scheduled for November.

The Father wanted joint 50/50 custody and access to begin on the date detailed in the court-appointed Clinical Psychologist’s Custody and Access Assessment report.  Because the mother would not agree to the report’s recommendations, this matter would be taken up at another Settlement Conference in front of a Judge at the courthouse.

2017 Part 4

Settlement Conference #2

The mother made the following offers:

  1. The mother proposed that the Father be granted 50-50 equal shared parenting in 7 years and that she would remain the sole decision-maker regarding their son’s health, education, religious activities, and activities until then.
    The Father rejected her offer.
     

  2. The mother then proposed that the Father be granted 50-50 equal shared parenting in 4 years and that she would remain the sole decision-maker regarding their son’s health, education, religious activities, and activities until then.
    The Father rejected her offer.
     

  3. The mother then proposed that the Father be granted 50-50 equal shared parenting in 2 years and that she would remain the sole decision-maker regarding their son’s health, education, religious activities, and activities until then.
    The Father rejected her offer.

  • Later that day, the Judge informed the mother that her position regarding decision-making and shared parenting was unreasonable.

  • The Judge informed the mother about what she could lose, in terms of access and custody, by going to trial.

  • The Judge informed the mother of the enormous financial costs of going to trial.

With the Judge’s advice in mind, the mother agreed to implement the recommendations outlined in the Clinical Psychologist’s Custody and Access Assessment Report — but only if the Father would make a series of absurd concessions.

The Father rejected all of her requests.

Eventually, the mother agreed to implement the 50/50 custody and access recommendations without strings attached.

After a 4-year custody battle, the Father finally received 50-50 custody and access to their son

2020 Arbitration

Once again, the mother launched legal proceedings, insisting that she should have 100% custody and access to their son.

 

The mother attempted to Use The Pandemic To Get 100% Custody and Access to Their Son.

Although the Father had 50/50 custody and access to their son, the mother held on to their son for 30 consecutive days at the beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

To give you an idea of just how unreasonable she was, the mother proposed the following two custody and access choices to the COVID-19 Arbitrator:

  1. For the entire duration of the Pandemic, their son would reside with the mother. 🙄

    OR
     

  2. The mother’s Proposed Custody and Access Plan (in her own words)

    • During the Pandemic, the mother wants to have their son remain with her 100% of the time until the following conditions are met:

      • The Father can confirm that he is not infected with Coronavirus.

      • The Father can demonstrate that he has not left his house since March 12, 2020

      • The Father can demonstrate that he has not had any visitors at his house since March 12, 2020

      • The number of cases In the community is better as established by authorities such as Chief Public Health Officers at the tri-level government

      • The Father agrees to a provision for police enforcement should the Father not adhere to the access schedule.

      • The Father guaranteed that no one, other than their son, would be allowed in his house until the Pandemic was over.

    • During the COVID-19 Pandemic, the mother wants to have 100% decision-making regarding their son. 🙄

One final example of the mother’s not-so-creative COVID-19 evidence package follows below:

The mother made a startling false allegation about their son’s Pediatrician.  The mother stated that the Doctor said something along the lines of COVID was a hoax and that the government is overreacting.” The Arbitrator did not believe the mother’s unsubstantiated false allegation.  

 

In their final report, the Arbitrator wrote the following damning statement in response to the mother’s blatant lie: 

"Firstly, the claim that the Doctor referred to the Coronavirus as a “hoax” is unlikely, especially considering her influential position as a pediatrician in the community.  Secondly, the mother’s efforts to protect their son during the COVID-19 pandemic, which includes her reluctance to shuttle their son between two households, raises questions about why she would seek further medical counsel from the same Doctor who allegedly stated that COVID-19 was a hoax.  The series of events suggests that the mother may be engaging in “doctor shopping,” potentially to find a medical professional who would support the mother’s preference for their son to remain solely in her care for the entirety of the Pandemic."

Ultimately, the Arbitrator ruled that the original, court-ordered 50/50 custody and access would continue throughout the Pandemic.

2021 Arbitration

  • Once again, the mother launched legal proceedings, insisting that she should have complete custody and access to their son.  At this point, their son was old enough to speak up for himself.  Consequently, the mother and Father agreed to conduct a Voice of the Child assessment.

    • During this assessment, their son disclosed to the assessors that the mother had physically abused him for several years.

    • The Voice of the Child Assessor promptly notified the Children’s Aid Society.  After investigating the mother, the Children’s Aid Society “verified” that she had been abusing their son all along.

    • However, the mother faced no repercussions for her verified child abuse. 🤬

 2024 Arbitration

  • Once more, the mother has initiated legal proceedings, asserting her desire for complete custody and access to their son.  As of May 2024, the litigation remains ongoing.

ABOUT THIS SITE... AND NOTE FROM THE FATHER

 

I, the Father, will start by loosely quoting Liam Neeson in the movie Taken:

“I do have a very particular set of skills -- skills I have acquired over a very long career.  Perfectly legal skills that make me a nightmare for entitled and morally bankrupt people like you -- mother.” 

I am an expert-level cyber security consultant and tackled my first police-involved cyber security case in 1994.

Immediately after I received 50/50 custody and access in 2017, I was shocked to find out that, in this jurisdiction, my court-related custody and access files were available to the public.  My sisters created this site because they, too, were the victims of false allegations of sexual abuse against my son.  Moreover, this site provides context for those publicly accessible court files, effectively countering the untruths that the mother continues disseminating among her echo chamber of gossiping friends.

Previous to the mother’s “pedophile in a past life” confession, I had implemented several legal countermeasures to halt or mitigate the negative repercussions of the mother’s illegal tactics.  Without these precautions and the invaluable support of my outstanding lawyer (Ms. JG), I would have undoubtedly been unjustly imprisoned because of the mother’s false allegations. 

My wonderful son has made this fight worthwhile.

... AND NOW A FEW PARTING WORDS TO THE SYSTEM

THAT LETS THIS KIND OF SHIT HAPPEN

 

What kind of system allows a depraved and morally corrupt mother to repeatedly make the same false child sexual abuse allegation over and over and over and over and over and over and over again without any repercussions for the so-called mother? 

  • In her own written, dated, and signed submission to the authorities and to the court, the mother openly acknowledged making the "pedophile in a past life" statements.  She also admitted that she has been dreaming about being a "pedophile in a past life" since her youth.  Yet, despite the extremely disturbing confession, the system took no action.

  • In an audio recording, the mother acknowledged that I had not physically assaulted her on the day I confronted her about calling my lawyer because of her gross and disgusting “pedophile” confession.  This false allegation was the basis for her calling the Police and keeping me away from my son for years. Once again, the system failed to address her false allegations or implement measures to prevent her from making further untrue claims.

  • Was there any consideration within the system about the possibility that the mother could have been abusing my son? Despite these serious concerns, the system failed to conduct any investigation into the mother.

  • In the summer of 2021, the Children’s Aid Society verified that my son was, in fact, being abused by his mother.

  • My son was asked during a Children's Aid Society interview how long the bruising lasts when his mom abuses him.  My son responded that the bruising lasts from 2 to 3 days.  The Children's Aid Society told me that my son's bruising did not last long enough for the police to get involved.  Can you imagine the look on my face when the Children's Aid Society made that statement?  I was beside myself!

  • Instead, the Children's Aid Society and the police investigated the numerous false accusations that the mother made against me, without ever interrogating her for her egregiously disturbing behaviour.

 

A FEW PARTING WORDS FOR

THE MOTHER'S ORIGINAL LAWYER​ (Ms. L)

Lawyer 'L', you're a piece of shit!
 

When the Judge at Settlement Conference #1 chastised you for letting the mother make so many false accusations, your lame response was that you "tried to make her stop." Seriously, that was your excuse? 

  • In prison, you know exactly what happens to those who are suspected of child sexual abuse... they are seriously injured, permanently disfigured, raped, and sometimes killed by other prisoners...yet you and your psychopath client (the mother) persisted with your endless false child sexual abuse allegations.

  • It's clear that you have serious issues understanding the ethical, moral, and legal boundaries of your job as a lawyer -- you need to do something about that.

  • Your questionable legal tactics destroyed my life and enabled your client (the mother) to continue to abuse my son for years.

  • ... So, Ms. L., this makes you an even bigger piece of SHIT than the mother because you should know better.

...AND FINALLY, A FEW PARTING WORDS

FOR THE mother

WHO HAS TWO BRAIN CELLS FIGHTING FOR 3RD PLACE...

You know who you are -- and like your attorney, you, too, are a piece of shit and are devoid of integrity -- feel free to challenge any of the completely factual statements on this site -- including the fact that you are a piece of shit.

Your actions triggered more than a dozen investigations against me and my family, liens continue to weigh on my house, and my business was driven to bankruptcy.

And after all of that, Children’s Aid verified that you, mother, are a child abuser who has been abusing my son for years.  

For your multiple false allegations of child sexual assault against me, you should be subject to the same length of imprisonment that I would have faced if I had been wrongly convicted.

And your defense in court? You, "mother", wrote to the court that you “did what any vigilant mother would do” and that your many false allegations “should not be used against you in a court of law.” (January 2017)

You’re not a “vigilant mother” ... you’re a fucking P S Y C H O P A T H

So, with this in mind, allow me to conclude with a more modern take on Clint Eastwood's immortal quote from this website's Introduction“fuck around and find out.”

Definition: To fuck with someone that you know shouldn’t be fucked with, then find out why they shouldn’t be fucked with in the most painful and humiliating way possible.

bottom of page